2001

Beyond Regulatory Compliance, Making Safety Second Nature
October 30-31, 2001 Program

Tuesday, October 30, 2001
8:00am - 9:30am
“Some Problems and Opportunities that Have Been Overlooked “, Tutorial and discussion led by Dr. Trevor Kletz
9:30am - 9:45am
“State of the Research Center: Research Program, Current Activities, and Future Direction,” Dr. Sam Mannan, Director, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center

TRACK I

TRACK II

TRACK III

10:15am - 11:45pm

Benchmarking and Measurement Systems

  • “Measuring Safety Performance to Achieve Long-Term Achievements, J.C. Manzella Lonza Inc.
  • “Process Safety Management: ProSmart,” B. Perry and J. Weaver, Center for Chemical Process Safety
  • SPR Operations & Maintenance Benchmark Study,” Jeff Haverly, General PHysics Corporationa nd Casimiro (Cas) Izquierdo, Strategic Petroleum Rseerve Office of Fossil Energy

Reactive Chemicals I

  • “Evaluation of Reaction Hazards for a Wiped-Film Evaporator,” H. Johstone, Dow Chemical Company
  • “Effect of Air in the Thermal Decomposition of 50 wt% Hydroxylamine Water,” L.O. Cisneros, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Mannan, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center
  • “Study on Risk Evaluation of Hydroxylamine/Water Solution,” H. Koseki, Y. Iwata, and K. Hasegawa, National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster, Japan

Risk Assessment / Risk Management I

  • “Tolerable and Acceptable Risk: Establishing QuantitativeTargets for the HPC Industry,” K. Clark, Horizon Consultants
  • “What is a QRA and What Can It Tell You,” J.D. Marx and J.B. Cornwell, Quest Consultants, Inc.
1:00pm - 2:30pm

Process Management for Safety

  • “Potential Impacts to Process Safety Management from Mergers, Acquisitions, Downsizing, and Re-Engineering,” J. Philey, DNV
  • “System Simulation of a Management of Change Process in a North Slope Oil Exploration Facility,” J.R. Hemsath, BP Exploration
  • “Process Safety Documentation: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” F.H. Knack, Knack Associates, Inc. and M.L. Brown, FMC Lithium Division

Reactive Chemicals II

  • “Theoretical and Experimental Techniques for the Evaluation of Reactive Chemicals Hazards,” A.A. Aldeeb, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Manna, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center
  • “Integration of a Reactive Chemicals Program into the Process Hazard Analysis Proecess at The Dow Chemical Company,” Tim Overton and D.J. Frurip, Dow Chemical Company
  • “Reactive Chemicals Incidents, What Does Existing Data Tell Us?” G. Joseph, US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

Risk Assessment / Risk Management II

  • “Development of an Inherent Safety Index Using Fuzzy Logic,” M. Gentile and M.S. Mannan, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center
  • “Reducing Accident Causation in Complex Plants by Identifying Mutual Misconceptions Between Designers and Operators,” P.W. Chung and B.P. Das, Loughborough University; J.S. Busby and R.E. Hibberd, University of Bath; and J.E. Strutt, Cranfield University
  • “Risk-Based Insepction Case Studies: Does RBI Improve Plant Safety,” S. Anderson, APTECH Engineering
3:00m - 4:30pm

Economics 101 of PSM Systems

  • “Economic Justification for Process Safety Systems,” S. Hillman, Honeywell, Inc.
  • “Regulatory Compliance - A Burden or an Opportunity,” R. Weber and M. Siecke, Process Safety and Reliability Group, Inc.
  • “Economical Mitigation of Explosion Hazards for Plan Siting,” H.R. Schulz and J.T. Cranefield, Wilfred-Baker Engineering, Inc.

Reactive Chemicals III

  • “Of Computers, Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Reactivity,” S. Saraf, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Mannan, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center
  • “From Experimental Data Via Kinetic Model to Predicting Reactivity and Assessing Reaction Hazards,” A. Kossoy, A. Benin, Y. Akhmetshin, ChemInform
  • “Calorimetric Studies on Butadiene,” M. Levin, Equilon, Inc.

Risk Assessment / Risk Management III

  • “Quantitative Risk Assessment for Refinery Industry,” A.S. Markowski, Technical University of Lodz
  • Offshore Risk Assessment - Simple or Complex?” J.A. Alderman, RRS Engineering and A. Gosse, Advantica Technologies
  • “Computer Aided Fault Tree Synthesis for Quantitative Risk Assessments,” Y. Wang, T.L. Teague, H.H. West, and M.S. Mannan
Wednesday, October 31, 2001
8:15am - 9:45am

General Session - National Chemical Safety Program
2001 Chemical Safety Assessment Report

A Report on Chemical Safety in the US, Survey of Public Trust and community Interaction, Future Direction

TRACK I

TRACK II

TRACK III

10:15am - 11:45pm

Safety Instrumented Systems

  • “Expanding the Applicability of the ISA TR84.02 in the Field,” L. Beckman, HIMA-Americas, Inc.
  • “Safe Automation Gap,” A.E. Summers, SIS-Tech Solutions, Inc.
  • “Evaluating Safety Instrumented System Needs Using Process Hazard Analysis Data,” F. Leverenz and K.M. McEldowney, Battelle-Integrated Risk Management

Aerosols and Release Modeling

  • “Modeling Aerosol Rainout,” T. Spicer and J. Havens, University of Arkansas
  • “SS3G - An Integrated Risk Analysis Program Using Engineering Principles for Building Damage,” J.L. Woodward and H.R. Schulz, Wilfred-Baker Engineering, Inc.
  • “Understanding the Formation of Heat Transfer Fluid Aerosols in Air,” K. Krishna, T.K. Kim, K.D. Kihm, W.J Rogers, and M.S. Mannan, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center

Case Histories / Case Studies

  • “Picture This! Incidents That Could Happen in Your Plant,” R.E. Sanders, PPG Industries
  • “Common Cuases and Corrections for Explosions and Fires in Improperly Inerted Vessels,” R.A. Ogle, A.R Carpenter, and D.T. Morrison, Packer Engineering
  • “Analysis of an LPG Explosion and Fire,” T.V. Rodante, ECRC
1:00pm - 2:30pm

Emergency Response and Community Interaction

  • “The Role of Community Advisory Panels in the Aftermath of Critical Incidents in the Chemical Processing Industry,” M. Dore, Lowenstein Sandler PC
  • “Handling a Crisis Situation Through Media Training,” P. Macias and D. Barton, Marasco-Newton Group, Ltd.
  • “Use of Surveys for Emergency Communications,” R. Deville, Harris, Deville, & Associates

Explosion Modeling and Mitigation

  • “Explosion Risk Assessment, How the Results Vary with the Approach Chosen,” O.R. Hansen and J.R. Bakke, GexCon
  • “A Comparison of Simple Vapor Cloud Explosion Methodologies,” G.A. Fitzgerald EQE International
  • “An Inherent Technology to Mitigate Vapor Cloud Explosions,” D.G. Clark, DuPont

Benchmarking PSM Program Components

  • “The Pitfalls of Alarm Rationalization and Benchmark Analysis,” L.D. Jensen, ProSys, Inc.
  • “Benchmarking Chlorine Safety Practices in the Water Industry,” H.C. Emery, San Antonio Water System
  • “Benchmarking MOC Practices in the Process Industry,” H.H. West, N. Keren, and M.S. Mannan, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center
3:00pm - 5:00pm

Forum on Future Research

  • Development of a Decision Support System for Chemical Accident Information
  • A Robust Sensor Fault Diagnosis System Using Neural Networks and a Dynamic Process Model
  • Issues in Fault Diagnosis and Isolation
    Chemical Plant Safety Performance Measurements
  • Electrostatic Hazards and Class I Flammable Liquids
Shortcuts



Contact Information
Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center
Room 200, Jack E. Brown Building
Texas A&M University, 3122 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-3122

Phone: (979) 845-3489
Fax: (979) 458-1493